In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled against the NCAA, paving the way for college athletes to receive more compensation for competing at their schools.The ruling, which upheld a 2014 decision from the United States https://www.shopwizardsedge.com/washington-wizards-jeresy/john-wall-jersey District Court for the Northern District of California, said that athletes can receive unlimited compensation, so long as the payments are related to education. , Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that while others will say the district court did not go far enough in allowing for athletes to receive compensation, others https://www.shopwizardsedge.com/washington-wizards-jeresy/otto-porter-jr-jersey will say it went too far and that it devalues the benefits of being an amateur athlete. However, he said the Supreme Court could only uphold the decision from the lower court and say that it acted within legal bounds to allow athletes to receive education-related compensation.MORE:But what does this mean for athletes moving https://www.shopwizardsedge.com/washington-wizards-jeresy/ian-mahinmi-jersey forward? Here's a breakdown of what we know. This decision by the Supreme Court in will now allow athletes to receive education-related payments from their schools.The lower court ruling had said that while there could be limits on how much student-athletes are compensated outside of education, anything that was related to education could not be limited, and that doing so would be a violation of anti-trust laws.That ruling also found that there could be unlimited non-cash benefits relating to education, including post-eligibility internships.For now, this just opens up the door for a https://www.shopwizardsedge.com/washington-wizards-jeresy/cassius-winston-jersey start of compensating athletes. Student-athletes can now receive money to pay for laptops and textbooks.Ultimately, however, this should lead tofuture challenges to whether NCAA athletes can be paid for competing. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a particularly critical concurring opinion in saying that "the NCAA's busine s model would be flatly illegal in almost any other industry in America," noting that restaurants could not cut the wages of cooks in an area because they felt customers would prefer to eat from low-paid cooks, along with a number of other examples of an industry's collective decision to cut pay.He continued: "price-fixing labor is price-fixing https://www.shopwizardsedge.com/washington-wizards-jeresy/anzejs-pasecniks-jersey labor. And price-fixing labor is ordinarily a textbook antitrust problem because it extinguishes the free market in which individuals https://www.shopwizardsedge.com/washington-wizards-jeresy/admiral-schofield-jersey can otherwise obtain fair compensation for their work." , lead attorney for the plaintiff, Shawne Alston, a former West Virginia football player, said that it was "tremendous to win this 9-0.""Hopefully it will be the major next step on the road to a true fair competitive system for these athletes." This latest decision, while a boon for athletes, does not impact the NIL legislation and discu sion that has been going on.As states acro s the country continue to pa s bills allowing athletes to profit off their name, image and likene s, the NCAA https://www.shopwizardsedge.com/washington-wizards-jeresy/bradley-beal-jersey is cooperating with the measure. that NCAA President Mark Emmert has told schools that he will pa s temporary rules allowing athletes to profit off their profile, and that all the member schools should pa s their own legislation to make it happen.While that will be another source of income for athletes, with the latest Supreme Court ruling, it might not be the last.In https://www.shopwizardsedge.com/washington-wizards-jeresy/garrison-mathews-jersey a statement sent to memberschools from Emmert, , the NCAA said that while the Supreme Court preserved the ruling from the lower court, it also allowed the NCAA to create its own rules for what are and are not educational benefits."Even though the decision does not directly addre s name, image and likene s, the NCAA remains committed to supporting NIL benefits for student-athletes," Emmert said in the statement. "Additionally, we remain committed to working with Congre s to chart a path forward, which is a point the Supreme https://www.shopwizardsedge.com/washington-wizards-jeresy/c-j-miles-jersey Court expre sly stated in its ruling."